'Elizabeth Bennet in “Pride and Prejudice” Essay\r'

' individuality refers to the rough get on or qualities which distinguish superstar person from a nonher. Ones comicalness constitutes a steady distinctiveness in his/her char worldageer. Thus, when this esthesis of graphic symbol is pose against the concept of individuality, the mutual crosstie results in the inherent emergence of a persons lawful identity. Although the distinguishing of separate individuals personalities remain prize in todays society, there existed a magazine in which the quest of uniqueness in compositors case and personality was dis enduranced. This held especi ally true up for wo workforce in Regency England in the 1800s. A fair sex in this season period, watchively the mount of Jane Austens superciliousness and Prejudice, endured numerous pressures and oerwhelmingly exigent rules from societal norms in order to set ab emerge proper placement in society.\r\nWomen of the prison term most importantly should embrace, and marry well, mainl y to obtain the substantially vital stubbornness of an exceptional reputation, and withal to support their family and concur a well(p) name. In addition, women held straightforward inferior societal coifs to men, having strict accessible leave aloneances to only partake in balls, dances, and dinners. These nominate to a woman acqui visit a greater extent of connections, which in warp increases their chance of marrying well. How of all date, Jane Austen does in fact picture a character that pass awayly triumphed over the particular pigeonhole of women in pursuit of her protest ideals. Elizabeth white avens, the protagonist and heroine of Pride and Prejudice, conveys a powerful sentiency of freedom, trunk genuinely candid of her views, and a reason for marrying which all contradict the conventional woman of the time. Elizabeth is an super atypical effeminate for her time, for she invariably refuses to allow the loss of her individualism and personal identity in a society which encourages women to do exactly that.\r\nInitially, Elizabeths attitude of independence induces her to act on the instinct of her unique ideals; her sense of self reliance eventually do a mass of pride and parti pris to formulate around her thoughts and dialogue. No, indeed I do not wish to repress the walk, for the distance is nothing when one has a motive; only three miles (28). Elizabeth acts in direct defiance towards her mother, and even though she expects to b think forth a negative archetypal impression, her deliver concerns (such as the well-being of her sister), tolerate as a top priorities in her independent mind. She also walks alone, signifying the scarcity of independence exhibited by women of the 1800s, particularly towards situations that could potentially imperil ones reputation, such as Elizabeths walk in the mud. To such perseverance in self- leave aloneed self-deception Elizabeth would fix no reply, and outright and in silence withdrew, immovable, that if he persisted in considering her repeated refusals as flattering encouragement, to retain to her father, whose negative might be expressed in such a bearing as to be decisive, and whose behavior at least could not be senseless for the affectation and coquetry of an elegant distaff (91).\r\nIn the thoroughness of Elizabeths dialogue, the author presents a whole tone of irritancy, for the protagonists self reliance on her own opinions could not sway Mr. Collins foolish assumptions. Through Elizabeth, the author also expresses cordially turn down of the inferiority of female usages of the time period, depicted by the occurrence of Mr. Bennet having to explain Elizabeths feelings instead of her effectively conveyancing them herself. I am only stubborn to act in that manner, that will, in my own opinion, constitute my gladness, without reference to you, or to every person wholly unconnected with me (294). Essentially, this account of Elizabeths to Lady C atherine demonstrates her fierce independence. She specifically states that her happiness is the only factor in the organization of her litigates. Her self reliance and her own opinions create an independence which allows her to disregard the judgments of others no government issue their affectionate standing. Elizabeths independent mindset constitutes a very opinionated personality and character, which becomes unfastened by remarkable dialogue.\r\nSubsequently, Elizabeths outspoken constitution causes consequently different interactions with people through dialogue, than would impostalisticly occur with a stereotypical female. I talked about the dance, and you ought to make most sort of remark on the size of it of the room or the number of couples (76). Normally, a person would not point out the faults in their dance partners tact. However, Elizabeths outspoken reputation allows her to mock an individual of higher well-disposed meaning for his discomfited behavior. T his interaction presents a lovely example of Jane Austens ironic humor. Darcy remains silent at the ball in order to remain heartyly excellent in his mind. However, he receives a torment from a member of lower mixer standing, a woman no less, concerning manners and formal protocol. From the very beginning†from the initiative moment, I may almost verbalise†of my acquaintance with you, your manners, impressing me with the fullest belief of your arrogance, your conceit, and your selfish disdain of the feelings of others, were such as to form the tush of disapprobation on which succeeding events render built so immovable a dislike; and I had not cognise you a month before I felt that you were the last man in the world whom I could ever be prevailed on to marry (159).\r\nWith none of the traditional politeness or subservience of her gender, Elizabeths reveals her black will to speak her mind in a situation of anger and in support of her feelings, which consequently h umiliates Darcy. He became a victim to something virtually unheard of for a man of his social stature: an outspoken woman. Darcys formal and polite exit reinforces the richness that high society places in changeless manners and obedience of formal protocol, line drawing his in a flash tentatively preserved sense of superiority. Lady Catherine seemed quite astonished at not receiving a direct resolvent (139). Elizabeth upon this instance speaks her mind in an fabulously daring manner. It seems that Elizabeth became the first individual ever to address Lady Catherine in that way, an exceptionally audacious stunt considering the old widows ownership of so much dignified impertinence. along with her outspoken behavior, Elizabeths marital ideals present themselves as the exact opposite of views expected to be held by women at the matrimonial age in Pride and Prejudice.\r\nFurthermore, most women of Jane Austens time period viewed trades union as the ultimate goal in life, a wondrou s aspiration to be attained for comfort, materialism, and social stature; Elizabeth exclusively declines to accept these ideals as governance for her own actions. It is a lawfulness universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, mustiness be in compulsion of a wife (1). This initial instruction of Jane Austens masterpiece offers a miniature subject of the entire plot, which concerns itself with the pursuit of single men in possession of a good fortune by various female characters. The preoccupation with socially advantageous uniting in nineteenth-century English society manifests itself here, for in claiming that a single man must be in want of a wife, the narrator reveals that the reverse is also true: a single woman, whose socially electropositive options are quite limited, desires a husband. However, Elizabeth criticizes the advantages and consequence of marriage in her society, such as whether or not one holds respect for their lifes partner, negatively portrayed by her parents.\r\nElizabeth fortifies these ideals in her declaration that â€Å"I am determined that nothing but the very deepest fuck will induce me into matrimony” (38). collectible to the fact that Elizabeths extreme opinion of marriage comes as a response to Janes exchangeable view, implications arise that Elizabeths point of view does not remain exclusively unique. However, closer scrutiny of Janes character reveals that although love intrigues her aspirations, she would easily and suitably succumb to societal expectations. Elizabeths outlook sets her remote apart from the majority of women at the time, her position expressing that only love constitutes acceptable reason to marry.\r\nYou could not make me happy, and I am convinced I am the last woman in the world who would make you so (102). Elizabeth adequately proves her profoundly unique views of matrimony by the adamant refusal of cardinal separate but exceedingly suitable marriage propo sals. In Elizabeths position, to not marry Mr. Collins would put her in a very precarious situation financially, condemn all her family to certain disaster, and to denounce tradition for the sake of her principles seems foolhardy but also requires a fair amount of mustered courage. In absolute liberation from the female stereotype she rejects the proposal of Mr. Darcy (likely the richest man she is ever to meet) as well revealing a blast disregard for societal norms and her prescribed role as a woman.\r\nIn conclusion, Elizabeth Bennets character intrigues many, unique individualism plainly shot her far from the stereotype of her gender. Throughout Pride and Prejudice, several references enlighten every fine attribute of Elizabeths remarkable character. Her interactions throughout the unused quite all the way depict her as an extremely atypical female when juxtaposed against the norm of her gender, during the distinctive period of Regency England in the year 1813. Through her i ndependence and defiance, clearly outspoken nature, and inimitable ideals concerning matrimony, Elizabeths character undeniably challenges the stipulated roles and formal protocol of the women in her time period. She remains principled and unshaken by the overwhelmingly strict expectations of society. Her every action becomes governed by assurance of her happiness alone, spot decisions too depend exclusively on her own sense of correct choices.\r\nThe character of Elizabeth Bennet provides inspiration for many neo women to develop a sense of courage and confidence, demonstrated by her determined will to speak her mind in movement to support certain unique principles of marriage. Elizabeth figuratively compares with Frodo Baggins of Lord of the Rings, by being dragged into a quest in which a ring is central. In marrying Darcy, she overturns the social hierarchy by taking a husband who remains considerably superior in social class. Using her newly enhanced opinions to translate wh at constitutes a happy (as well as proper) marriage on her independent price she makes certain of her true happiness, concluding in final contentment that she will now never desire to discard her ring into Mount Doom.\r\nâ€Æ'Works Cited\r\nAusten, Jane. Pride and Prejudice. Ann mandrel: Borders Classics, 2006.\r\n'