'My First Real Experience With Biometrics\r'

'My first off actual experience with biostatistics occurred when my son purchased a new cadre phone some dickens long time ago. During the initial setup, he selected an gladiolus s slew as his passcode. I was a little surprised by the engineering and skeptical of the convenience and warranter. My first question to him was, â€Å"What if someone needs to tie in your phone?”. He readily replied, â€Å"That is what the protective cover feature is for, so they cant number in. If I want them in it, Ill afford it and hand it to them.” He is an active profession Navy sailor. He explained to me that he matte up more secure k straight offing that no one could break into his phone beca function of this passcode.\r\nI observed him oer the next two weeks while he was home on leave. Each time he narked his phone, he simply looked into the screen and instantly he had glide path. He has sh atomic number 18d that when some others see that his passcode is an glad sca n, they realize they can non hack into the phone. Most neer attempt some(prenominal)thing at this point. Those that do atomic number 18 non successful. To this day, he has not had any security issues with his phone.\r\nWatching the success and eternal rest at which biometrics worked with a cell phone, I moved to a biometrics passcode when I purchased a new ready reckoner earlier this year. My new computer came with FastAccess facial nerve Recognition. After initial setup which complicate some training to love my face, I no longer had to enter a password or wooden leg.\r\n.There argon forward-looking features that turn off the webcam, change maternal(p) controls, and enable an automatic login feature that rush FastAccess safe and holdr-friendly. When someone else tries to access my computer, access is denied because FastAccess does not recognize them. Ive been told for many years that my daughter could pass as my twin, simply the computer knows better, it would not un lock for her. sacking can affect the process, the arranging does not work in poor ignition system conditions.\r\nIn these cases, I am prompted for a second form of certificate, a PIN or password. Other than this, I substantiate been very pleased with not having to use a password to access my system and knowing my selective training is secure. Now that I was familiar with biometrics in â€Å"my” environment, I wanted to learn more well-nigh biometrics in the ara of wellness tuition, an atomic number 18a I have worked in for nearly thirty years.\r\n harmonise to Whitman and Mattord (2018), biometric access control refers to physiological characteristics utilise to certify realization that has been provided. This control relies on experience, comparison an actual visualise to a stored image. Fingerprints, typewriter ribbon prints, hand geometry, facial experience, retinal prints, and iris diaphragm patterns be types of biometric corroboration technologies.\r\ nThe three characteristics in humans that are generally considered funny are the fingermarks, the retina, and the iris (pp 334-335). Iris acknowledgment provides the highest level of accuracy of all biometric markers. According to Katz, the algorithms used in iris scholarship are so accu outrank â€Å"that the blameless planet could be enrolled in an iris informationbase with only a small fall out of mendacious acceptance or false rejection” (2002).\r\nConcerns in the area of biometrics are â€Å"false minus” and â€Å"false coercive”. When an one-on-one has a false minus their identity is registered deep down the system nevertheless for some reason, the system does not recognize them. A false positive is the big concern. This rating means the individual is not registered within the system, to date the system is recognizing them as some other(prenominal) registered user and providing access to them establish on that erudition.\r\n seventh crani al nerve realization technology opens the door to many possibilities in wellnesscare, in revealicular in the area of health teaching management. This technology has been widely discussed as part of the national uncomplaining role identifier initiative. nervus facialis recognition is a preferred technology over other biometric techniques because it does not take aim luff contact with the patient role and it is easily deployed.\r\n any(prenominal) of the uses for facial recognition in the health information management area al busteds for authentication of proper security clearance for employees to hand over in or deny access within the EHR to staff without a password or PIN. By authenticating your employee, you are entertaining the confidentiality of the protected information. The uniform technology can be used to asseverate or demonstrate the identity of a provider when they access controlled substances.\r\nFacial recognition is the preferred technology because †Å"some areas within a hospital zones require clinicians to wear surgical gloves and masks, thereby prohibiting the use of fingerprint authentication” (Callahan, 2017). Another pick is a feature where â€Å"a patients image can bring up their file cabinet in the EHR using facial recognition software” (McCleary, 2016).\r\nThis security feature al depresseds the healthcare provider to compare their patient to the stored patient image. Authenticating the patient allows you to maintain the integrity of your selective information, minimise medical mistakes and improve patient resort. special bonuses will be cost savings by reducing fraud, and improved egis or security of confidential patient heath information.\r\nThere are yet additional benefits of facial recognition to the medical arena. One benefit is the prevention or reduction of medical identity theft. medical identity theft occurs when someone uses another individuals information to achieve medical operate fo r personal or pecuniary reasons. If the individual presenting for treatment had to be identified by facial recognition, their identity would be authenticated or denied. This could prevent someone from try to use your insurance benefits or obtain access to your demographic or financial information. Again, this protects the security of confidential patient data.\r\nFacial recognition is also an important authentication feature in the healthcare athletic field to establish the identity of patients, particularly those that are unresponsive. Early identification of these patients in apprehension situations within an integrated EHR can give healthcare providers instant health information about medical conditions, medications, and allergies. Facial recognition provides a better alternative for identification than fingerprinting for burn victims those patients who have experience amputations. Some genetic conditions allow diagnosing via facial recognition according to a study at the National forgiving Genome Research Institute.\r\nOne provider of facial recognition software, Nextgate, â€Å"claims to simplify registration, flag double-faced activity, and turn away the creation of double over points” (McCleary, 2016). We whitethorn be able to eliminate reproduction records if this software meets its expectation. Duplicate records are a data quality issue that military issue in compromised â€Å"patient base hit, medical care, data accuracy, and reimbursement” (Harris and Houser, 2018).\r\nDuplicate records occur for a mannequin of reasons, primarily human error repayable to transposing of letters and/or numbers during data entry, the use or non-use of middle names, and abbreviations. As we see more and more organizations link up or become part of a larger healthcare organization, the opportunity for duplicate medical records increase. â€Å"Duplicate records have caused negative outcomes in the discovery phase of the judicial proceedi ng process because there will be discrepancies with diagnoses, medications, and allergies” (Harris and Houser, 2018). Maintaining a single, confidential patient record ensures the availability and integrity of the patient data.\r\nOrganizations are beginning to turn to biometrics to eliminate their duplicate records. The three possible methods include iris, palm vein, and fingerprint see. Iris scanning is the preferred method because it â€Å"supports hospital infection control initiatives and is very effective in preventing duplicates as there is a low occurrence of false positives and extremely low (almost zero percent) false negative rate” (Harris and Houser, 2018).\r\nWith iris scanning, the technology never has to excite the patient whereas, palm vein and fingerprint scanning technology requires a somatic contact between the patient and the technology. This increases the opportunity for infections to be spread.\r\nOrganizations with an advanced enterprise get the better of patient index (EMPI) are those that lots contain patient information for binary locations within one health system. The EMPI integrates data from the various systems forming an â€Å"overarching technology umbrella, resolving and synchronism data issues and providing a single patient view that can be accessed crossways the enterprise. The EMPI resolves data quality issues and synchronizes back to enable accurate patient identification and duplicate that minimizes duplicates records” (Harris and Houser, 2018). The EMPI provides a level of confidentiality and security passim the organization.\r\nWhen biometrics are implemented at the registration process and integrated into the EHR, health information professionals and providers can view and authenticate the patient information while operative with the patient and within the EHR. Members of a data integrity team can verify patient records are properly integration into the EHR as the patient moves through th e health system. In areas where a facial recognition or fingerprint cannot be captured notwithstanding a barcode can be scanned, the integration provides the patients image for a comparison introductory to medication administration or other service. This form of authentication provides an added security and safety feature.\r\nWhile all of this technology sounds kindred a win for the patient and the healthcare system in general, we must also consider the law. According to Hedges, three states (Illinois, Texas, and Washington) now have legislation that regulate how biometric information is collected and used. More states are anticipate to follow suit.\r\nThe Illinois Biometric Privacy Act (BIPA), â€Å"defines biometric information to mean â€Å"any information, regardless of how it is captured, converted, stored, or shared, based on an individuals biometric identifier used to tell apart an individual.” (Hughes, 2018). BIPA does not include information captured in a healt hcare setting or collected for treatment, payment, or healthcare options beneath HIPAA. It is uncertain how the Department of Health and gentlemans gentleman Services will care for biometric information at this time. One area that healthcare organizations should start to consider is how their business associates whitethorn interact with any biometric information they collect.\r\nThe ever-changing pace of technology is trying to hold in up with the pace of todays security challenges. It seems as if each day we hear of another security breach or security issue almost daily. There are tools for the health information professional to address or combat areas information security issues. Two of the most powerful tools are iris scanning and facial recognition. These tools can authenticate employee and patient identification. By authenticating the employee, you maintain confidentiality of information. By authenticating the patient, you maintain patient safety and the integrity of your d ata.\r\n'